Damage Caps in Arizona Personal Injury Law (2024)

Damage Caps in Arizona Personal Injury Law (1)

Does the Grand Canyon State place limits on personal injury settlements and judgments?

The Arizona Constitution prohibits capping damages for personal injury lawsuits. But there are some limitations on what personal injury plaintiffs can recover, even if those limitations aren’t technically “damage caps.”

A “damage cap” is a law that limits the amount of compensation an injured person can receive in a lawsuit. A number of states have established damage caps for certain types of cases and categories of damages.

Arizona is 1 of only 5 states whose Constitution prohibits capping damages for personal injury lawsuits.

Let’s take a closer look at damage caps and their role in Arizona personal injury cases.

Types of damages

In a personal injury case, you’re entitled to compensation from the person or entity responsible for your injuries. The term for this compensation is “damages.” In Arizona, there are three main categories of damages:

  • Economic damages
  • Non-economic damages
  • Punitive damages

In states with damage caps, the cap often applies to a specific category of damages. For example, a state might cap non-economic damages at $500,000, but not place a cap on economic damages. Or a state might place a $500,000 cap on both economic and non-economic damages, but prohibit a plaintiff from recovering any punitive damages at all.

Let’s take a closer look at each category of damages.

Enjuris tip: Find out how damages are calculated.

Economic

Economic damages (sometimes called “special compensatory damages”) are designed to compensate you for the monetary losses caused by your injury. These losses might include:

  • Medical expenses
  • Lost income

Enjuris tip: Use our medical expense worksheet to keep track of your medical expenses following an accident.

Non-economic

Non-economic damages (sometimes called “general compensatory damages”) are designed to compensate you for the non-monetary consequences of you injury. These damages are difficult to prove and might include:

  • Physical pain and suffering
  • Emotional distress
  • Loss of consortium

Enjuris tip: Use our post accident journal to keep track of your injuries impact on your everyday life.

Punitive

Punitive damages are intended to punish a defendant for their conduct and to deter others from engaging in similar conduct. In Arizona, punitive damages are only available in two types of cases:

  • Cases where the defendant had ill will and intentionally caused harm to the victim
  • Cases where the defendant knew what they were doing was unsafe and likely to cause harm

Arizona doesn’t recognize a cap on punitive damages against private individuals or companies. However, the United States Supreme Court in State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. Campbell, 538 U.S. 408 (2003) ruled that a ratio of punitive damages to compensatory damages that exceeds 9:1 will generally be deemed unconstitutional.

Arizona completely prohibits punitive damages in personal injury actions against public entities or public employees acting within the scope of their employment.

Arizona Damage Caps

Damage Caps in Arizona Personal Injury Law (2)

Damage caps are prohibited by Arizona’s Constitution

The Constitution of the State of Arizona prohibits placing caps on damages for personal injury or death.

Specifically, Article 2, Section 31 of the Constitution states that:

“No law shall be enacted in this state limiting the amount of damages to be recovered for causing the death or injury of any person.”

This means that in Arizona the jury has complete authority to decide the amount of damages awarded in a personal injury lawsuit. A judge won’t reduce the jury’s award unless the award is so excessive or inconsequential that it’s considered unjust.

The Constitutions of Arkansas, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, and Wyoming also include language specifically prohibiting the limitation of damage awards in tort cases.

The Constitutions of AZ, AR, KY, PA, and WY prohibit placing caps on damages for personal injury cases. Tweetthis

Challenges to Arizona’s Constitution

Because the Arizona Constitution prohibits lawmakers from limiting the amount of damages recoverable in a personal injury lawsuit, instituting damage caps would require amending the Constitution. In Arizona, the amendment process involves two steps:

  • The initiation of an amendment by either a majority vote of both houses in the legislature, a convention called by the people and the legislature by a majority vote, or a petition signed by a number equal to at least 15% of the votes cast for the office of governor in the last general election
  • A majority vote in a general or special election

On three occasions (in 1986, 1990, and 1994), voters in Arizona were given the opportunity to amend the Constitution to allow for damage caps. On each occasion, a majority of voters rejected the proposed amendment.

There have been recent talks about initiating yet another amendment to allow for damage caps.

Workers’ compensation claims

Workers’ compensation claims are different than civil lawsuits. Arizona’s prohibition of damage caps applies to civil lawsuits, not workers’ compensation claims.

In a workers’ compensation claim, an injured employee is entitled to lifetime medical and compensation benefits, but the total compensation that can be awarded is capped by law.

Comparative fault

Arizona follows a “pure comparative fault theory.” This means that the amount of damages a plaintiff can recover in a personal injury suit is reduced by a percentage that reflects the plaintiff’s degree of fault—no matter what that percentage may be.

For example, let’s say a driver runs a red light and crashes into you. But let’s also say you were driving at night with your headlights off. At trial, the jury finds you 20% at fault and the defendant 80% at fault. Under Arizona’s comparative fault theory, you would only be able to recover 80% of your damages.

While this isn’t technically a “damage cap,” it does represent a potential limitation to the amount of damages you can recover in a personal injury lawsuit.

If you have questions about what sort of compensation might be available in your personal injury case, use our free online directory to contact an experienced Arizona attorney.

Downloads:

Free personal injury guides for download to print or save. View all downloads.

Tell your story:

Tell your story - What would you want others to know? Tell us what happened in your accident, and how life has changed for you.

Find an attorney:

Search our directory for personal injury law firms.
See our guide Choosing a personal injury attorney.

Damage Caps in Arizona Personal Injury Law (2024)

FAQs

Damage Caps in Arizona Personal Injury Law? ›

Arizona does not have damage caps. This means that by law, Arizona doesn't limit settlement amounts for the claimant. In fact, Arizona is one of only five states that considers damage caps unconstitutional. However, Arizona law does prevent plaintiffs from recovering punitive damages against public entities.

Are caps on damages good? ›

If a medical malpractice suit faces a cap on damages in that particular state, then the plaintiff can still recover a good amount through a product liability lawsuit. Many would say that damage caps are a good thing. They prevent lawsuit-happy litigants from unnecessarily filing claims.

How do you quantify general damages? ›

General Damages

Instead, this amount is based on a variety of factors, including the nature and severity of the injury, the amount of pain you experience, length of recovery, and the disruption of your life. Most of these are fairly subjective, which can make it difficult to arrive at a number.

How do you calculate damages? ›

There's no set formula to calculate damages. However, a general rule to discern the amount awarded is to combine your expenses and determine a value for your pain and suffering. A personal injury lawyer can help you determine the amount in both general and special damages that you deserve.

How is pain and suffering calculated in AZ? ›

Multiplier Method for Calculating Pain and Suffering Damages

The multiplier method bases the value of non-economic damages on a multiple of the total value of economic damages. A number between 1.5 and five is multiplied by the value of economic damages to calculate the value of pain and suffering damages.

What are the pros of damage caps? ›

Proponents of damages caps contend that damages caps benefit consumers by reducing the rate of increase in health insurance.

How do caps on damages work? ›

WHAT IS A “CAP” ON DAMAGES? A “cap” on damages is law that puts an arbitrary “one-size-fits-all” limit on the amount an injured person can receive in compensation irrespective of what a judge or jury decides compensation should be.

How does a court determine the amount of damages to be awarded? ›

When calculating actual damages, courts will often look at the fair market value of destroyed/damaged property, lost wages/income, and necessarily incurred expenses.

What damages Cannot be measured? ›

Non-Monetary Damages are damages that cannot be measured by money. Non-monetary damages cover harms such as, physical and mental pain and suffering, loss of the enjoyment of life, and loss of consortium resulting from an injury.

What is the formula for personal injury settlements? ›

The Damages Formula

The adjuster will multiply the medical special damages number by one and a half to three times if the injury is minor and up to five or more times if the injury is especially deliberating and long-term. After this number is calculated, any income lost as a result of the injury will be added.

How much can you get out of pain and suffering? ›

The Multiplier method adds up all incurred costs like medical bills, lost wages, etc. along with inevitable future costs. It then takes that total and multiplies it 1.5 to 5 times that amount depending on the severity of the pain, suffering, and emotional distress.

What is the present value of damages? ›

The present value of damages is the amount of money a person would need to receive and invest today, to be able to afford specified future expenditures (e.g. future medical expenditures, household services, etc.), at their inflationary adjusted values.

What is the value of damages? ›

To calculate the present value of damages, one must determine the amount of money that, if reasonably invested, will compensate the plaintiff for their future damages.

Is there a cap on pain and suffering in Arizona? ›

Arizona Prohibits Caps on Personal Injury Damages

This means the state's law prohibits a cap on damages one would receive from a wrongful death or personal injury case. If you've been involved in a personal injury case, Arizona cannot and will not reduce the amount of your award.

How is mental pain and suffering calculated? ›

Multiplier Method

A longer recovery and more severe injuries generally result in a higher multiplier. The multiplier is usually a number between 1.5 and 5. The multiplier formula is the total cost of your medical bills multiplied by the multiplier, which sets the monetary amount that equates to your pain and suffering.

What is covered in pain and suffering? ›

Pain and suffering is a term that applies to the noneconomic aspect of a plaintiff's damages claim in a personal injury case. It typically includes physical pain, as well as mental anguish, and other physical, mental, and emotional damages stemming from a personal injury.

Why are caps on damages unconstitutional? ›

Washington: Sophie v. Fibreboard was the first case in which a court overruled a malpractice damages cap on constitutionality. The Washington Supreme Court found that the state damage cap violates the right to a trial by jury. Applying a cap on malpractice awards violates the jury's role in determining damages.

Are caps on damages unconstitutional? ›

(Wrongful death case) Court found cap unconstitutional as applied to common law medical malpractice cases. The court held the cap violated the open courts doctrine because such limits are an unreasonable and arbitrary way to assure a rational relationship between actual damages and amounts awarded.

Do liability caps work? ›

Do they work? Yes, they often do work, provided they are used correctly. The courts will often uphold such clauses, especially where sophisticated commercial parties are involved, provided the cap passes the 'reasonable' test.

Is caps on damages an example of tort reform? ›

Two common examples of tort reform include limits on non-economic damages and limits on punitive damages. Both of these types of limits cap the compensation plaintiffs can receive. Plaintiffs may be limited in how much money they can recover for pain and suffering and lost wages.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Lidia Grady

Last Updated:

Views: 6531

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (45 voted)

Reviews: 84% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Lidia Grady

Birthday: 1992-01-22

Address: Suite 493 356 Dale Fall, New Wanda, RI 52485

Phone: +29914464387516

Job: Customer Engineer

Hobby: Cryptography, Writing, Dowsing, Stand-up comedy, Calligraphy, Web surfing, Ghost hunting

Introduction: My name is Lidia Grady, I am a thankful, fine, glamorous, lucky, lively, pleasant, shiny person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.